Sergio Gamez-Ruiz v. Merrick Garland

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 2025
Docket23-2304
StatusUnpublished

This text of Sergio Gamez-Ruiz v. Merrick Garland (Sergio Gamez-Ruiz v. Merrick Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sergio Gamez-Ruiz v. Merrick Garland, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2304 Doc: 18 Filed: 01/14/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-2304

SERGIO GAMEZ-RUIZ,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: October 18, 2024 Decided: January 14, 2025

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Ivan Yacub, YACUB LAW OFFICES, LLC, Woodbridge, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Lindsay Corliss, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-2304 Doc: 18 Filed: 01/14/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Sergio Gamez-Ruiz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We review a

decision denying reopening for abuse of discretion and will grant the petition only if the

Board’s decision is “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.” Garcia Hernandez v.

Garland, 27 F.4th 263, 266 (4th Cir. 2022) (internal quotation marks omitted). We have

reviewed the administrative record and Gamez-Ruiz’s claims and find no abuse of

discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See In re Gamez-Ruiz (B.I.A.

Dec. 4, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Napoleon Garcia Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
27 F.4th 263 (Fourth Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sergio Gamez-Ruiz v. Merrick Garland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sergio-gamez-ruiz-v-merrick-garland-ca4-2025.