Sergio Deases v. State

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 27, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00813-CR NO. 14-18-00814-CR

SERGIO DEASES, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1550953 & 1552708

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals his convictions for aggravated assault of a public servant with a deadly weapon and aggravated robbery of a person over the age of 65. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes both appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record in each case and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate records and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record in each case and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal in each case is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record in each case. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, in each case the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell and Poissant. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).