Sergio Alaniz v. Jesus Maria Alvarez
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00081-CV
Sergio ALANIS, Sr., et al., Appellants
v.
Jesus Maria ALVAREZ, et al., Appellees
Ana Lisa GARZA, Intervenor
From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-00-00328 Honorable Federico Hinojosa, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 4, 2012
DISMISSED
Appellants filed notice of appeal on February 9, 2012 indicating their intent to appeal an
interlocutory order granting Intervenor Ana Lisa Garza’s motion for summary judgment. Having
determined that the summary judgment order appeared to be interlocutory, we ordered appellants 04-12-00081-CV
to show cause in writing within fifteen days why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. Appellants did not respond. Intervenor responded, and filed a motion to dismiss the
appeal for want of jurisdiction because the summary judgment order is interlocutory. The record
shows the summary judgment order is interlocutory, as it does not dispose of the appellants’ claims
against the defendants, and there is no severance order in effect. Therefore, we must dismiss this
appeal. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205-06 (Tex. 2001). Accordingly,
intervenor’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sergio Alaniz v. Jesus Maria Alvarez (Sergio Alaniz v. Jesus Maria Alvarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.