Sergio Aguilar v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 22, 2018
Docket05-17-01355-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sergio Aguilar v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co. (Sergio Aguilar v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sergio Aguilar v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Dismissed; Opinion Filed February 22, 2018.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01355-CV

SERGIO AGUILAR, Appellant V. SERVICE LLOYDS INSURANCE CO., Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-01742

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart Sergio Aguilar appeals the trial court’s order granting Service Lloyds Insurance Co.’s

motion for summary judgment. After reviewing the clerk’s record, the Court questioned its

jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was untimely filed. We instructed

appellant to file a letter brief explaining how this Court has jurisdiction. Appellee has filed a

motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a letter brief but failed to

address this Court’s jurisdiction over the appeal.

When a party files a timely motion for new trial, a notice of appeal is due ninety days

after the date the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Without a timely notice of

appeal this Court lacks jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b). The trial court signed the judgment on June 19, 2017. Because appellant filed a timely

motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due on Monday, September 18, 2017. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 4.1, 26.1(a). Appellant filed a notice of appeal on November 27, 2017. Because the

notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(a). We deny as moot appellee’s motion to dismiss.

/Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE

171355F.P05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SERGIO AGUILAR, Appellant On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-17-01355-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-01742. Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. SERVICE LLOYDS INSURANCE CO., Justices Francis and Brown participating. Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee SERVICE LLOYDS INSURANCE CO. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant SERGIO AGUILAR.

Judgment entered this 22nd day of February, 2018.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sergio Aguilar v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sergio-aguilar-v-service-lloyds-insurance-co-texapp-2018.