Sergei Freidzon v. Thomas Gorman

687 F. App'x 242
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2017·No. 16-1995·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sergei Freidzon appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to vacate the voluntary dismissal of his Chapter 13 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Freidzon v. Gorman, No. 1:16-cv-00627-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed July 29, 2016 and entered Aug. 1, 2016). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Freidzon’s motions for appointment of counsel and for an interpreter. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sergei Freidzon v. Thomas Gorman, 687 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2017).

687 F. App'x 242 (Sergei Freidzon v. Thomas Gorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related