Sergei Freidzon v. Thomas Gorman
This text of 687 F. App'x 242 (Sergei Freidzon v. Thomas Gorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Sergei Freidzon appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to vacate the voluntary dismissal of his Chapter 13 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Freidzon v. Gorman, No. 1:16-cv-00627-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed July 29, 2016 and entered Aug. 1, 2016). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Freidzon’s motions for appointment of counsel and for an interpreter. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
687 F. App'x 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sergei-freidzon-v-thomas-gorman-ca4-2017.