Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States Army
847 F.2d 1362, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8315, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,063, 1988 WL 57538
Opinion
*1363 ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of the nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States Army, 847 F.2d 1362, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8315, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,063, 1988 WL 57538 (9th Cir. 1988).
847 F.2d 1362 (Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steffan v. Cheney
780 F. Supp. 1 (District of Columbia, 1991)
James M. Woodward v. United States
871 F.2d 1068 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
David Falk v. Secretary of the Army
870 F.2d 941 (Second Circuit, 1989)
BenShalom v. Marsh
703 F. Supp. 1372 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1989)
D. Jean Pope, and Quali-Built, Inc. v. Savings Bank of Puget Sound, and Ticor Title Insurance Co. And Bruce H. Hurst
850 F.2d 1345 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States Army
847 F.2d 1329 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)