Sergeant Hypolite v. State of North Carolina J.R. Hunt

Fourth Circuit

Sergeant Hypolite v. State of North Carolina J.R. Hunt

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17419, 1995 WL 309196

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 19, 1995

Docket94-6995

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 773 (Sergeant Hypolite v. State of North Carolina J.R. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sergeant Hypolite v. State of North Carolina J.R. Hunt, 54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17419, 1995 WL 309196 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Sergeant HYPOLITE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina; J.R. Hunt, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 94-6995.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Sergeant Hypolite, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hypolite v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-118-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Sergeant HYPOLITE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina; J.R. Hunt, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 94-6995.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Sergeant Hypolite, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hypolite v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-118-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17419, 1995 WL 309196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sergeant-hypolite-v-state-of-north-carolina-jr-hun-ca4-1995.