Serge v. Robertson

573 So. 2d 1072, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1009, 1991 WL 15462
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1991
DocketNo. 89-2058
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 573 So. 2d 1072 (Serge v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Serge v. Robertson, 573 So. 2d 1072, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1009, 1991 WL 15462 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order ratifying a general master’s report and rejecting appellant’s exceptions to the report.

The record reflects that the appellant did not consent to a referral to the master. Nor was there any conduct on his part constituting a waiver of the referral. To the contrary, there is unrefuted evidence that he orally objected. See Bathurst v. Turner, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla.3d DCA 1988); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(c). It was error to ratify the report and reject the exceptions in the absence of a transcript or adequate written record of the master’s hearing. Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.490(f).

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Clements v. De Clements
662 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
573 So. 2d 1072, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1009, 1991 WL 15462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serge-v-robertson-fladistctapp-1991.