Serge v. Dreher

524 So. 2d 1068, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 968, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1544, 1988 WL 34008
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 1988
DocketNo. 87-0440
StatusPublished

This text of 524 So. 2d 1068 (Serge v. Dreher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Serge v. Dreher, 524 So. 2d 1068, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 968, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1544, 1988 WL 34008 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s entry of the amended final judgment nunc pro tunc to the date of the original final judgment or in reserving jurisdiction to tax costs in favor of appellees. However, we do reverse and remand this case with instructions for the trial court to make the following corrections to the amended final judgment: (1) delete all references to fraud; (2) provide for interest at the statutory rate rather than at the rate of twelve percent per annum and (3) provide that plaintiff, Emil Palik, shall “go hence without day.”

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., and WARNER, MARTHA C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
524 So. 2d 1068, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 968, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1544, 1988 WL 34008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serge-v-dreher-fladistctapp-1988.