Serfass v. Dreisbach

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Serfass v. Dreisbach

21 A. 523, 141 Pa. 142, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1053

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 23, 1891

DocketNo. 10

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 A. 523 (Serfass v. Dreisbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Serfass v. Dreisbach, 21 A. 523, 141 Pa. 142, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1053 (Pa. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The learned judge of the court below submitted this case to the jury in a fair and adequate charge. This disposes of the first seven assignments of error. The remaining assignments allege that the court erred in not charging as suggested in said assignments. These are sins of omission only; and, as no such points were submitted, we would be loth to convict the learned judge of error in not doing what he was not asked to do. If counsel desired more specific instructions, they should have asked for them.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The learned judge of the court below submitted this case to the jury in a fair and adequate charge. This disposes of the first seven assignments of error. The remaining assignments allege that the court erred in not charging as suggested in said assignments. These are sins of omission only; and, as no such points were submitted, we would be loth to convict the learned judge of error in not doing what he was not asked to do. If counsel desired more specific instructions, they should have asked for them.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A. 523, 141 Pa. 142, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serfass-v-dreisbach-pa-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack