Serels v. Serels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Serels v. Serels

282 A.D. 1065, 126 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5835

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 1065 (Serels v. Serels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Serels v. Serels, 282 A.D. 1065, 126 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from an order which (1) denied her motion to punish defendant for contempt of court on the ground that he had failed to make certain payments for alimony and counsel fee, as directed in a judgment of separation, and for further incidental relief; and (2) modified the said judgment, upon defendant’s cross application, by reducing the alimony from $70 a week to $60 a week. Order, modified by striking therefrom the second and third ordering paragraphs and by providing, in lieu thereof, the following: “Ordered that defendant’s cross application for an order modifying the judgment be and the same is hereby in all respects denied.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. No change of circumstances was shown by the defendant since the entry of the judgment less than three months prior to the making of his cross application for reduction in alimony. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff appeals from an order which (1) denied her motion to punish defendant for contempt of court on the ground that he had failed to make certain payments for alimony and counsel fee, as directed in a judgment of separation, and for further incidental relief; and (2) modified the said judgment, upon defendant’s cross application, by reducing the alimony from $70 a week to $60 a week. Order, modified by striking therefrom the second and third ordering paragraphs and by providing, in lieu thereof, the following: “Ordered that defendant’s cross application for an order modifying the judgment be and the same is hereby in all respects denied.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. No change of circumstances was shown by the defendant since the entry of the judgment less than three months prior to the making of his cross application for reduction in alimony. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1065, 126 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/serels-v-serels-nyappdiv-1953.