Sere v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

228 Ct. Cl. 818, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 416, 1981 WL 21494
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedJuly 28, 1981
DocketApp. No. 27-81
StatusPublished

This text of 228 Ct. Cl. 818 (Sere v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sere v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare, 228 Ct. Cl. 818, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 416, 1981 WL 21494 (cc 1981).

Opinion

[819]*819Petitioner in this action seeks review of a final order of the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration denying her request for Supplemental Security Income benefits under title XVI of the Social Security Act. The government has moved to dismiss on the ground that we lack jurisdiction over the subject matter of the claim. We grant the government’s motion.

Under title XVI, a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services "shall be subject to judicial review as provided in section 405(g) of this title to the same extent as the Secretary’s final determinations under section 405 of this title.” 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3) (1976). Section 405(g) provides, inter alia, that appeals of a decision of the Secretary "shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides or has his principal place of business.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

On two prior occasions, we have held that, under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), only the district courts have jurisdiction to review final decisions of the Secretary regarding the payment of Social Security disability payments. See Hickman v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 716, cert. denied, 454 U.S. 847 (1981); Burton v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 846 (1974). Because title XVI, dealing with Supplemental Security Income, incorporates 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), we do not have jurisdiction over claims under that title.

The petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burton
506 F.2d 1406 (Court of Claims, 1974)
Hickman
652 F.2d 69 (Court of Claims, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 Ct. Cl. 818, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 416, 1981 WL 21494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sere-v-secretary-of-health-education-welfare-cc-1981.