Serbin

168 Ct. Cl. 934, 1964 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 190, 1964 WL 1624
United States Court of Claims·Decided December 14, 1964·No. No. 228-64·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Incentive awards for Government employees. — -Plaintiffs sue to recover the difference between the incentive award paid them under 5 U.S.C. 2121 et seq. and the maximum amount of $25,000 permitted by law. The case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition and upon consideration thereof, togéther with the opposition thereto and without oral argument, the court concluded that plaintiffs had failed adequately to allege clear abuse of discretion by defendant’s officers in making the incentive award, which allegation is a necessary prerequisite to any review [935] by this court in this type of case. On the basis of Martilla v. United States, 118 Ct. Cl. 177, and Kempinski v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 451, the court on December 14, 1964, ordered that defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition be granted and the petition was dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Serbin, 168 Ct. Cl. 934, 1964 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 190, 1964 WL 1624 (cc 1964).

168 Ct. Cl. 934 (Serbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. United States
Federal Claims, 2021
Cooley v. United States
76 Fed. Cl. 549 (Federal Claims, 2007)
Anderson v. United States
73 Fed. Cl. 199 (Federal Claims, 2006)
Hayes v. United States
20 Cl. Ct. 150 (Court of Claims, 1990)
Griffin v. United States
215 Ct. Cl. 710 (Court of Claims, 1978)
Shaller v. United States
202 Ct. Cl. 571 (Court of Claims, 1973)
Campbell
174 Ct. Cl. 1276 (Court of Claims, 1966)