SER Ford Motor Co. v. Hon. David W. Nibert, Judge

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in SER Ford Motor Co. v. Hon. David W. Nibert, Judge. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 W. Va. 235
West Virginia Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 2015·No. 14-0766·Separate

Opinion

No. 14-0766 – State of West Virginia ex. rel. Ford Motor Company, et al. v. The Honorable David W. Nibert FILED April 9, 2015 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

OF WEST VIRGINIA

Justice Ketchum, concurring:

I agree that this case should be remanded for the trial judge to make specific

findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by West Virginia Code § 56-1­

1(e).

My reading of the record, West Virginia Code § 56-1-1, and our case law

lead me to believe, without any doubt, that the proper forum is Michigan.

Nevertheless, the trial judge may have seen something I missed and should be

allowed to make specific findings and conclusions before this Court rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SER Ford Motor Co. v. Hon. David W. Nibert, Judge, (W. Va. 2015).

SER Ford Motor Co. v. Hon. David W. Nibert, Judge (SER Ford Motor Co. v. Hon. David W. Nibert, Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 56-1
West Virginia § 56-1
§ 56-1-1
West Virginia § 56-1-1