Sequoia Orange Co. v. Clayton Yeutter
985 F.2d 1419, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1537, 93 Daily Journal DAR 2749, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3517, 1993 WL 55523
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 3, 1993·No. 91-15241·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The opinion filed August 21, 1992, 973 F.2d 752, is amended as follows:
The first full sentence of the slip opinion at page 10044 (973 F.2d at 758): “The decision also indicated that without these amendments the marketing order should be terminated. Id.” is deleted.
Appellee’s petition for rehearing and clarification is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sequoia Orange Co. v. Clayton Yeutter, 985 F.2d 1419, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1537, 93 Daily Journal DAR 2749, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 3517, 1993 WL 55523 (9th Cir. 1993).
985 F.2d 1419 (Sequoia Orange Co. v. Clayton Yeutter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Charles M. McCarthy Jr. v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
221 F.3d 1119 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. United States
110 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Sunny Cove Citrus Ass'n
854 F. Supp. 669 (E.D. California, 1994)
Cecelia Packing Corp. v. United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Marketing Service
10 F.3d 616 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)