Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sequeira v. State

Sequeira v. State

96 So. 3d 1050, 2012 WL 3711463, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14511
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 29, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-2035
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 3d 1050 (Sequeira v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sequeira v. State, 96 So. 3d 1050, 2012 WL 3711463, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14511 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Further, appellant is removable based on other convictions and is not entitled to postconviction relief on his claim. See Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38, 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Buton v. State, 995 So.2d 1130,1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

MAY, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buton v. State
995 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Forrest v. State
988 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Davis v. State
69 So. 3d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 3d 1050, 2012 WL 3711463, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sequeira-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.