Sequeira v. State

96 So. 3d 1050, 2012 WL 3711463, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14511
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 2012·No. No. 4D11-2035·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Davis v. State, 69 So.3d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Further, appellant is removable based on other convictions and is not entitled to postconviction relief on his claim. See Forrest v. State, 988 So.2d 38, 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Buton v. State, 995 So.2d 1130,1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

MAY, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sequeira v. State, 96 So. 3d 1050, 2012 WL 3711463, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14511 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

96 So. 3d 1050 (Sequeira v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buton v. State
995 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Forrest v. State
988 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Davis v. State
69 So. 3d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)