Sepulvado v. Jindal
134 S. Ct. 1789, 188 L. Ed. 2d 771, 572 U.S. 1053, 82 U.S.L.W. 3585, 2014 WL 284957, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2475
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 7, 2014
DocketNo. 13–892.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 134 S. Ct. 1789 (Sepulvado v. Jindal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sepulvado v. Jindal, 134 S. Ct. 1789, 188 L. Ed. 2d 771, 572 U.S. 1053, 82 U.S.L.W. 3585, 2014 WL 284957, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2475 (U.S. 2014).
Opinion
Motion of Allen S. Keller, M.D., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motion of the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales for leave to a file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United *1790States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tommy Sells v. Brad Livingston
750 F.3d 478 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 S. Ct. 1789, 188 L. Ed. 2d 771, 572 U.S. 1053, 82 U.S.L.W. 3585, 2014 WL 284957, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 2475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sepulvado-v-jindal-scotus-2014.