Sepulvado v. Bauman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Sepulvado v. Bauman

753 So. 2d 207, 1999 La. LEXIS 3473, 1999 WL 1273733

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 17, 1999

DocketNo. 99-CC-3326

StatusPublished

This text of 753 So. 2d 207 (Sepulvado v. Bauman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sepulvado v. Bauman, 753 So. 2d 207, 1999 La. LEXIS 3473, 1999 WL 1273733 (La. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In re HCA Highland Hospital Inc.; Columbia Highland Hospital; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. A, No. 413-917; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 33363-CW.

Granted in part. The case is remanded to the trial court to conduct an in camera inspection, if it has not already done so, of all materials requested by plaintiffs in their Third and Fourth requests for Production on which relator asserts a peer-review privilege. See Smith v. Lincoln General Hospital, 605 So.2d 1347 (La.1992). The writ is denied as to that portion of the trial court’s judgment ordering production of non-party patient records, subject to the provision that any personal identifying information be redacted. See Speer v. Whitecloud, 99-1879 (La.10/15/99), 744 So.2d 1283.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re HCA Highland Hospital Inc.; Columbia Highland Hospital; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. A, No. 413-917; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 33363-CW.

Granted in part. The case is remanded to the trial court to conduct an in camera inspection, if it has not already done so, of all materials requested by plaintiffs in their Third and Fourth requests for Production on which relator asserts a peer-review privilege. See Smith v. Lincoln General Hospital, 605 So.2d 1347 (La.1992). The writ is denied as to that portion of the trial court’s judgment ordering production of non-party patient records, subject to the provision that any personal identifying information be redacted. See Speer v. Whitecloud, 99-1879 (La.10/15/99), 744 So.2d 1283.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

753 So. 2d 207, 1999 La. LEXIS 3473, 1999 WL 1273733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sepulvado-v-bauman-la-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack