Sepeda, Jospeh v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 8, 2004
Docket14-04-00606-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Sepeda, Jospeh v. State (Sepeda, Jospeh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sepeda, Jospeh v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2004

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2004.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-00606-CR

NO. 14-04-00607-CR

JOSEPH SEPEDA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 949,911 & 951,674 

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N


In cause number 949,911,[1] Appellant entered a guilty plea to theft from the person of another, a state jail felony, enhanced by two previous felony convictions for burglary.  In cause number 951,674,[2] Appellant entered a guilty plea to theft from the person of another, enhanced by the two prior felony burglary convictions.  In accordance with the terms of plea bargain agreements with the State, on May 6, 2004, the trial court sentenced appellant in each cause number to confinement for eight years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.  Because appellant has no right to appeal, we dismiss. 

The trial court entered certifications of the defendant=s right to appeal in which the court certified that these are plea bargain cases, and the defendant has no right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The trial court=s certifications are included in the records on appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. 

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 8, 2004.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



[1]  Appellant was indicted for robbery for stealing the victim=s purse after pushing her to the ground and hitting her.

[2]  Appellant was indicted for robbery for threatening to kill the victim while committing theft.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sepeda, Jospeh v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sepeda-jospeh-v-state-texapp-2004.