Sepe v. State ex rel. Boren
271 So. 2d 116, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3058
Opinion
This cause is before us to review the decision of the District Court reported at 256 So.2d 259, a decision certified by the District Court as passing on a question of great public interest, to-wit:
“The construction of the speedy trial rule, and particularly, what exceptional circumstances are required to be present to permit a trial to be held without the maximum limitations contained in the rule.”
After argument and upon consideration of the record and briefs, we hold that the District Court of Appeal has correctly de[117] cided the cause and its decision is adopted as the ruling of this Court.
Accordingly, certiorari is discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sepe v. State ex rel. Boren, 271 So. 2d 116, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3058 (Fla. 1972).
271 So. 2d 116 (Sepe v. State ex rel. Boren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fazio v. State
4 Fla. Supp. 2d 128 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1982)
Stuart v. State
360 So. 2d 406 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
State Ex Rel. Mullins v. Swigert
345 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
State v. Boren
273 So. 2d 415 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)