Sepcich v. Tarabocchia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sepcich v. Tarabocchia

257 A.D. 1013, 14 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8912

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1939·Published

Opinion

Order restraining appellant Valentine & Company, Ihe., from taking any action to enforce the judgment recovered by it against the copartnership of Joseph Tarabocchia and Nicholas Sepcich, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the facts disclosed in this record we are of the opinion that the granting of the order was an improper exercise of the court’s discretion. Appeal by the plaintiff dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order restraining appellant Valentine & Company, Ihe., from taking any action to enforce the judgment recovered by it against the copartnership of Joseph Tarabocchia and Nicholas Sepcich, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Upon the facts disclosed in this record we are of the opinion that the granting of the order was an improper exercise of the court’s discretion. Appeal by the plaintiff dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Sepcich v. Tarabocchia, 257 A.D. 1013, 14 N.Y.S.2d 485, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 1013 (Sepcich v. Tarabocchia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.