Seoane v. Seoane
This text of 514 So. 2d 430 (Seoane v. Seoane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Angel Antonio SEOANE, Appellant,
v.
Francisca Milian SEOANE, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Villalobos & Ramos and Ameli Padron-Fragetta, Miami, for appellant.
Myra Bennett Torres, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
*431 PER CURIAM.
Agreeing with the trial court that appellant's prior actions, in and out of court, are inconsistent with his current position that appellee is not entitled to relief, we affirm the Order Declaring that Husband is Estopped from Denying the Validity of his Dominican Divorce. See Arnold v. Arnold, 500 So.2d 739 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Clagett v. King, 308 A.2d 245 (D.C.App. 1973); Mayer v. Mayer, 66 N.C. App. 522, 311 S.E.2d 659, review denied, 311 N.C. 760, 321 S.E.2d 140 (1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
514 So. 2d 430, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seoane-v-seoane-fladistctapp-1987.