Seoane v. Seoane

514 So. 2d 430, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2511
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1987·No. 87-1695·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

514 So.2d 430 (1987)

Angel Antonio SEOANE, Appellant,
v.
Francisca Milian SEOANE, Appellee.

No. 87-1695.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 3, 1987.

Villalobos & Ramos and Ameli Padron-Fragetta, Miami, for appellant.

Myra Bennett Torres, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

*431 PER CURIAM.

Agreeing with the trial court that appellant's prior actions, in and out of court, are inconsistent with his current position that appellee is not entitled to relief, we affirm the Order Declaring that Husband is Estopped from Denying the Validity of his Dominican Divorce. See Arnold v. Arnold, 500 So.2d 739 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Clagett v. King, 308 A.2d 245 (D.C.App. 1973); Mayer v. Mayer, 66 N.C. App. 522, 311 S.E.2d 659, review denied, 311 N.C. 760, 321 S.E.2d 140 (1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seoane v. Seoane, 514 So. 2d 430, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2511 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

514 So. 2d 430 (Seoane v. Seoane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farnham v. Farnham
323 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2009)
Keith M. Farnham v. Donna M. Farnham
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2009
Lopes v. Lopes
852 So. 2d 402 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Lambertini v. Lambertini
655 So. 2d 142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Keller v. Keller
521 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)