Sents v. Boysen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sents v. Boysen

210 A.D.2d 896, 621 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 896 (Sents v. Boysen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sents v. Boysen, 210 A.D.2d 896, 621 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Oneida County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this child custody case, Family Court failed to set forth "those facts upon which the rights and liabilities of the parties depend” (Matter of Jose L. I., 46 NY2d 1024, 1025-1026; see, Clarke v Clarke, 101 AD2d 911, 912). The absence of the required findings precludes proper appellate review. Because important questions of credibility were raised at the [897]*897hearing, we decline to exercise our power to review the record and make our own findings (see, Matter of Jose L. L, supra, at 1026; Giordano v Giordano, 93 AD2d 310). We, therefore, remit the matter to Family Court to set forth its factual findings. (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.—Custody.) Present—Green, J. P., Wesley, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Oneida County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this child custody case, Family Court failed to set forth "those facts upon which the rights and liabilities of the parties depend” (Matter of Jose L. I., 46 NY2d 1024, 1025-1026; see, Clarke v Clarke, 101 AD2d 911, 912). The absence of the required findings precludes proper appellate review. Because important questions of credibility were raised at the [897]*897hearing, we decline to exercise our power to review the record and make our own findings (see, Matter of Jose L. L, supra, at 1026; Giordano v Giordano, 93 AD2d 310). We, therefore, remit the matter to Family Court to set forth its factual findings. (Appeal from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.—Custody.) Present—Green, J. P., Wesley, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 896, 621 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sents-v-boysen-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack