Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Norcold, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 | SENTRY SELECT INSURANCE Case No. 1:21-cv-00521-JLT-SAB 11 | COMPANY, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO Plaintiff, CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Vv PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE 13 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 NORCOLD, INC., et al., (ECF No. 44) 15 Defendants. 16 17 On September 24, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 18 || each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF No. 44.) In light of the stipulation of 19 || the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 20 || Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. | Dated: _September 25, 2024 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28