Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Norcold, Inc.
Opinion
SENTRY SELECT INSURANCE Case No. 1:21-cv-00521-JLT-SAB COMPANY, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO Plaintiff, CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Vv PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE NORCOLD, INC., et al., (ECF No. 44) Defendants. On September 24, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF No. 44.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Dated: _September 25, 2024 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Norcold, Inc. (Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Norcold, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.