Sentry Insurance v. Kolb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sentry Insurance v. Kolb

190 A.D.2d 804, 594 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 A.D.2d 804 (Sentry Insurance v. Kolb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sentry Insurance v. Kolb, 190 A.D.2d 804, 594 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for [805]*805underinsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated January 2, 1991, which denied the application and granted the respondent leave to settle a related personal injury action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to deny the petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits and to permit settlement of the related personal injury action (cf, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Taglianetti, 122 AD2d 40; Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v Lopez, 163 AD2d 390). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for [805]*805underinsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated January 2, 1991, which denied the application and granted the respondent leave to settle a related personal injury action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to deny the petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of a claim for underinsured motorist benefits and to permit settlement of the related personal injury action (cf, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Taglianetti, 122 AD2d 40; Matter of State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v Lopez, 163 AD2d 390). Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 804, 594 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sentry-insurance-v-kolb-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack