Sentry Indemnity Co. v. Angel & Son, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sentry Indemnity Co. v. Angel & Son, Inc.

332 So. 2d 83, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14377

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 1976

DocketNo. 75-1341

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 332 So. 2d 83 (Sentry Indemnity Co. v. Angel & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sentry Indemnity Co. v. Angel & Son, Inc., 332 So. 2d 83, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14377 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

DOWNEY, Judge.

This interlocutory appeal involves the propriety of the trial court’s order transferring this cause from Orange County to Broward County.

Appellee Angel & Son, Inc., entered into a contract to construct a sidewalk for the City of Fort Lauderdale in Broward County, Florida. Pursuant to that contract Angel & Son, Inc., furnished a performance bond with appellant as surety. As a condition precedent to the issuance of the bond the corporate appellee and the individual appellees executed an agreement to indemnify appellant for any loss accruing to appellant by virtue of its acting as surety.

One of the subcontractors recovered a judgment against both appellant and the corporate appellee for labor and materials furnished on the construction project, and in due course appellant satisfied the judgment. This suit for indemnity was then instituted by appellant in Orange County. Appellees moved to transfer the case to Broward County, asserting that the construction contract was entered into in Bro-ward County, the construction project was in Broward County, and the defendant-ap-pellees were all residents of said county. Plaintiff-appellant, a foreign corporation, countered the motion by affidavit stating that the regional office for the plaintiff is located in Orlando, Orange County, Florida. The trial court granted the motion and ordered the cause transferred to Bro-ward County.

Essentially appellant is suing appel-lees for money owed as a result of the indemnity contract. The contract does not provide for the place of payment; therefore payment (if due) is to be made where the payee resides or has an established place of business. Baruch v. W. B. Haggerty, Inc., 137 Fla. 799, 188 So. 797 (1939); Saf-T-Clean, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Corporation, Fla.1967, 197 So.2d 8.

Under the rule set forth in the foregoing cases appellant’s cause of action (if any) accrued in Orange County. Venue therefore lies in Orange County, and the court erred in transferring the cause to Broward County.

For the foregoing reasons, the order appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOWNEY, Judge.

This interlocutory appeal involves the propriety of the trial court’s order transferring this cause from Orange County to Broward County.

Appellee Angel & Son, Inc., entered into a contract to construct a sidewalk for the City of Fort Lauderdale in Broward County, Florida. Pursuant to that contract Angel & Son, Inc., furnished a performance bond with appellant as surety. As a condition precedent to the issuance of the bond the corporate appellee and the individual appellees executed an agreement to indemnify appellant for any loss accruing to appellant by virtue of its acting as surety.

One of the subcontractors recovered a judgment against both appellant and the corporate appellee for labor and materials furnished on the construction project, and in due course appellant satisfied the judgment. This suit for indemnity was then instituted by appellant in Orange County. Appellees moved to transfer the case to Broward County, asserting that the construction contract was entered into in Bro-ward County, the construction project was in Broward County, and the defendant-ap-pellees were all residents of said county. Plaintiff-appellant, a foreign corporation, countered the motion by affidavit stating that the regional office for the plaintiff is located in Orlando, Orange County, Florida. The trial court granted the motion and ordered the cause transferred to Bro-ward County.

Essentially appellant is suing appel-lees for money owed as a result of the indemnity contract. The contract does not provide for the place of payment; therefore payment (if due) is to be made where the payee resides or has an established place of business. Baruch v. W. B. Haggerty, Inc., 137 Fla. 799, 188 So. 797 (1939); Saf-T-Clean, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Corporation, Fla.1967, 197 So.2d 8.

Under the rule set forth in the foregoing cases appellant’s cause of action (if any) accrued in Orange County. Venue therefore lies in Orange County, and the court erred in transferring the cause to Broward County.

For the foregoing reasons, the order appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

332 So. 2d 83, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sentry-indemnity-co-v-angel-son-inc-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack