Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. v. Mistras Group, Inc., Jody W. Olson and Carey Roberts

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 4, 2014
Docket01-12-00370-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. v. Mistras Group, Inc., Jody W. Olson and Carey Roberts (Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. v. Mistras Group, Inc., Jody W. Olson and Carey Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. v. Mistras Group, Inc., Jody W. Olson and Carey Roberts, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. v. Mistras Group, Inc., Jody Olson, and Carey Roberts

Appellate case number: 01-12-00370-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-11229

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

Appellees, Mistras Group, Inc., Jody Olson, and Carey Roberts, moved for modification of our October 22, 2013 judgment in this case. In our October 22, 2013 judgment, we reversed the trial court’s award of appellate attorney’s fees and remanded that issue “for further proceedings to determine the proper amount of appellate attorney’s fees to award to Jody Olson.” We affirmed the remainder of the trial court’s judgment as modified. Thus, the only issue still pending before the trial court is that of the proper amount of appellate attorney’s fees to be awarded to Olson. Appellees now ask that we add the word “severs” to our judgment, so that it would state that “the Court severs and affirms the remaining the remaining portions of the trial court’s judgment as herein modified.” However, our plenary power has expired, and the requested modification is not the type of “clerical error” that may be corrected after our plenary power has expired. See TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(b), 19.3(a). Accordingly, the motion to modify our judgment is DENIED. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes___________________________ Acting individually

Date: __December 4, 2014__________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. v. Mistras Group, Inc., Jody W. Olson and Carey Roberts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sentinel-integrity-solutions-inc-v-mistras-group-i-texapp-2014.