Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

Seventh Circuit

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

41 F.2d 57, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2726

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided May 28, 1930·No. No. 4347·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant’s publicaH°n an alleged libel. The verdict of the 3my m appellee’s favor was, on his motion, ^ aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.

Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland [58] Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must he granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant’s publicaH°n an alleged libel. The verdict of the 3my m appellee’s favor was, on his motion, ^ aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.

Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland [58] Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must he granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie, 41 F.2d 57, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2726 (7th Cir. 1930).

Pincite

41 F.2d 57 (Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related