Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie
This text of 41 F.2d 57 (Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant’s publicaH°n an alleged libel. The verdict of the 3my m appellee’s favor was, on his motion, ^ aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.
Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland [58]*58Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must he granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F.2d 57, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sentinel-co-v-dinwiddie-ca7-1930.