Senter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Senter v. State

242 So. 2d 465, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1971·No. No. 70-617·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of murder in the second degree after a trial be[466] fore the court without jury. On this appeal he urges the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment and, in particular, he urges that the record does not contain any evidence to show “a depraved mind regardless of human life”. F.S. 782.-04, par. 2, F.S.A.

We have reviewed the record and find the evidence of guilt to be clear and convincing. The evidence of depraved mind is sufficient under the standard set in Ramsey v. State, 114 Fla. 766, 154 So. 855 (1934).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of murder in the second degree after a trial be[466] fore the court without jury. On this appeal he urges the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment and, in particular, he urges that the record does not contain any evidence to show “a depraved mind regardless of human life”. F.S. 782.-04, par. 2, F.S.A.

We have reviewed the record and find the evidence of guilt to be clear and convincing. The evidence of depraved mind is sufficient under the standard set in Ramsey v. State, 114 Fla. 766, 154 So. 855 (1934).

Affirmed.

Senter v. State, 242 So. 2d 465, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5465 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

242 So. 2d 465 (Senter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related