Senter v. Peninsula Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Senter v. Peninsula Lumber Co.

220 P. 139, 109 Or. 325, 1923 Ore. LEXIS 102

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 13, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 P. 139 (Senter v. Peninsula Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Senter v. Peninsula Lumber Co., 220 P. 139, 109 Or. 325, 1923 Ore. LEXIS 102 (Or. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

MoCOURT, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action against the defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant in blowing off a boiler and permitting the steam therefrom to enter the place where plaintiff was working. From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

The questions, both of law and of fact, presented by this appeal are identical with those considered by the court in the case of Hicks v. Peninsula Lumber Co., ante, p. 305 (220 Pac. 133). For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the Circuit .Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McBride, C. J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI