Senteno v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Senteno v. State

768 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11434, 2000 WL 1269300

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 2000·No. No. 2D99-3708·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence entered in this case on remand from the first appeal. See Senteno v. State, 737 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We reverse the judgment entered on remand' as to count six because that judgment does not comply with the opinion that we issued in the first appeal. On remand, the trial court shall enter a new judgment accurately stating the convictions permitted by our last opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence entered in this case on remand from the first appeal. See Senteno v. State, 737 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We reverse the judgment entered on remand' as to count six because that judgment does not comply with the opinion that we issued in the first appeal. On remand, the trial court shall enter a new judgment accurately stating the convictions permitted by our last opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Senteno v. State, 768 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11434, 2000 WL 1269300 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

768 So. 2d 523 (Senteno v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related