Senteno v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Senteno v. State

768 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11434, 2000 WL 1269300

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 8, 2000

DocketNo. 2D99-3708

StatusPublished

This text of 768 So. 2d 523 (Senteno v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Senteno v. State, 768 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11434, 2000 WL 1269300 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence entered in this case on remand from the first appeal. See Senteno v. State, 737 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We reverse the judgment entered on remand' as to count six because that judgment does not comply with the opinion that we issued in the first appeal. On remand, the trial court shall enter a new judgment accurately stating the convictions permitted by our last opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentence entered in this case on remand from the first appeal. See Senteno v. State, 737 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We reverse the judgment entered on remand' as to count six because that judgment does not comply with the opinion that we issued in the first appeal. On remand, the trial court shall enter a new judgment accurately stating the convictions permitted by our last opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

768 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11434, 2000 WL 1269300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senteno-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack