Sensormatic Security Corp. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp.

97 F.R.D. 725, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17155
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided May 5, 1983·No. Civ. A. No. 83-952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Upon consideration of plaintiff’s memorandum to show cause, and the entire record herein, it is, by the Court, this 5th day of May, 1983,

ORDERED, that defendant shall have until May 15, 1983 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Counsel are reminded that it is for the Court, not the parties, to grant extensions of time in cases pending before it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sensormatic Security Corp. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp., 97 F.R.D. 725, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17155 (D.D.C. 1983).

97 F.R.D. 725 (Sensormatic Security Corp. v. Sensormatic Electronics Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re J & a Concrete Contractors, Inc.
58 B.R. 51 (W.D. Texas, 1986)