Sensor Sys. v. Fed. Aviation Admin.
This text of 2011 DNH 141 (Sensor Sys. v. Fed. Aviation Admin.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Sensor Systems Support, Inc.
v. Civil N o . 10-cv-262-PB Opinion N o . 2011 DNH 141 Federal Aviation Administration
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Sensor Systems Support, Inc. filed a complaint seeking to
compel the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) to produce
records in response to its request under the Freedom of
Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. The statutory
provision on which Sensor Systems bases its claim for relief is
5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A)(ii), which requires agencies to act on
appeals from initial FOIA decisions within 20 days. The FAA has
filed a motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary
judgment.
Sensor Systems bases its complaint on the assumption that
the court can compel the FAA to disclose all requested documents
without redaction if the FAA violated its rights under 5 U.S.C.
§ 552(a)(6)(A)(ii). This assumption is incorrect. The FOIA gives federal courts the power to decide claims
that an agency has improperly withheld agency records. 5 U.S.C.
§ 552(a)(4)(B); Kissinger v . Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the
Press, 445 U.S. 136, 150 (1980). It also authorizes a federal
court to review an agency’s failure to respond to a request for
expedited review of an FOIA request. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(E)
(iii)-(iv); Judicial Watch, Inc. v . U . S . Naval Observatory, 160
F.Supp.2d 111, 112 (D.D.C. 2001). The FOIA does not similarly
authorize a court to review an agency’s failure to act on an
appeal. Although such a failure to act gives rise to a
presumption that the requester has exhausted administrative
remedies, 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(C)(i), it does not entitle the
requester to injunctive relief without a determination that the
records have been wrongfully withheld pursuant to § 552(a)
(4)(B).
Sensor Systems has made a conclusory allegation in the
complaint that “the FAA has wrongfully withheld agency records.
. . ,” but its complaint does not plead sufficient facts to
support a claim for relief under § 552(a)(4)(B). Because the
court lacks the power to grant the only claim that Sensor
Systems has made, the FAA is entitled to summary judgment on the
complaint in its current form. The court will delay entry of
final judgment for 20 days to give Sensor Systems an opportunity
2 to file an amended complaint setting forth a claim for relief
under § 552(a)(4)(B).
The FAA’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative for
summary judgment (Doc. N o . 10) is granted.
SO ORDERED.
/s/Paul Barbadoro Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge
September 1 6 , 2011
cc: G. Shepard Bingham, Esq. Matthew A . Caffrey, Esq. Michael T . McCormack, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 DNH 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sensor-sys-v-fed-aviation-admin-nhd-2011.