Sensor Sys. v. Fed. Aviation Admin.

2011 DNH 141
CourtDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire
DecidedSeptember 16, 2011
DocketCase No. 10-cv-262-PB
StatusPublished

This text of 2011 DNH 141 (Sensor Sys. v. Fed. Aviation Admin.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sensor Sys. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 2011 DNH 141 (D.N.H. 2011).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Sensor Systems Support, Inc.

v. Civil N o . 10-cv-262-PB Opinion N o . 2011 DNH 141 Federal Aviation Administration

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Sensor Systems Support, Inc. filed a complaint seeking to

compel the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) to produce

records in response to its request under the Freedom of

Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. The statutory

provision on which Sensor Systems bases its claim for relief is

5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A)(ii), which requires agencies to act on

appeals from initial FOIA decisions within 20 days. The FAA has

filed a motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary

judgment.

Sensor Systems bases its complaint on the assumption that

the court can compel the FAA to disclose all requested documents

without redaction if the FAA violated its rights under 5 U.S.C.

§ 552(a)(6)(A)(ii). This assumption is incorrect. The FOIA gives federal courts the power to decide claims

that an agency has improperly withheld agency records. 5 U.S.C.

§ 552(a)(4)(B); Kissinger v . Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the

Press, 445 U.S. 136, 150 (1980). It also authorizes a federal

court to review an agency’s failure to respond to a request for

expedited review of an FOIA request. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(E)

(iii)-(iv); Judicial Watch, Inc. v . U . S . Naval Observatory, 160

F.Supp.2d 111, 112 (D.D.C. 2001). The FOIA does not similarly

authorize a court to review an agency’s failure to act on an

appeal. Although such a failure to act gives rise to a

presumption that the requester has exhausted administrative

remedies, 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(C)(i), it does not entitle the

requester to injunctive relief without a determination that the

records have been wrongfully withheld pursuant to § 552(a)

(4)(B).

Sensor Systems has made a conclusory allegation in the

complaint that “the FAA has wrongfully withheld agency records.

. . ,” but its complaint does not plead sufficient facts to

support a claim for relief under § 552(a)(4)(B). Because the

court lacks the power to grant the only claim that Sensor

Systems has made, the FAA is entitled to summary judgment on the

complaint in its current form. The court will delay entry of

final judgment for 20 days to give Sensor Systems an opportunity

2 to file an amended complaint setting forth a claim for relief

under § 552(a)(4)(B).

The FAA’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative for

summary judgment (Doc. N o . 10) is granted.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge

September 1 6 , 2011

cc: G. Shepard Bingham, Esq. Matthew A . Caffrey, Esq. Michael T . McCormack, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Naval Observatory
160 F. Supp. 2d 111 (District of Columbia, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 DNH 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sensor-sys-v-fed-aviation-admin-nhd-2011.