Senrick Wilkerson v. the Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 19, 2017
Docket03-16-00808-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Senrick Wilkerson v. the Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton (Senrick Wilkerson v. the Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Senrick Wilkerson v. the Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00808-CV

Senrick Wilkerson, Appellant

v.

The Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-16-003961, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant Senrick Wilkerson, proceeding pro se, seeks to appeal the trial court’s order

declaring him a vexatious litigant. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.054-.056. Wilkerson’s

brief on appeal was originally due on May 19, 2017. On June 21, the Clerk of the Court notified

Wilkerson that his brief was overdue and that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution

unless he filed a brief or reasonably explained his failure to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a).

Wilkerson’s deadline to respond to our notice was July 3, 2017.

On July 10, 2017, Wilkerson filed a motion for extension of time, explaining that he

is currently incarcerated and requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief

“until after November of 2017.”1 We grant in part the motion for extension of time and order

1 Although appellant has titled his motion as a “motion to abate appeal,” we will treat his motion as a motion for extension of time. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b). Wilkerson to file a brief no later than September 18, 2017. No further extension of time will be

granted and failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

It is so ordered this 19th day of July, 2017.

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 11.054
Texas CP § 11.054

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Senrick Wilkerson v. the Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senrick-wilkerson-v-the-attorney-general-of-texas-ken-paxton-texapp-2017.