Senrick Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-16-00119-CV
SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant
v.
HUNTSVILLE INSTITUTIONAL PAROLE OFFICE, ET AL, Appellees
From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1527660
ORDER
Senrick Wilkerson’s affidavit of indigence, Motion for Reporter’s Record, and Motion to be Assigned Counsel, each filed on April 27, 2016 did not contain a proper proof of service as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. By letter dated April 29, 2016, the Clerk of this Court warned Wilkerson that the failure to provide a proper proof of service for each document within 14 days from the date of the letter would result in the Court striking the affidavit of indigence, Motion for Reporter’s
Record, and Motion to be Assigned Counsel. More than 14 days have passed and Wilkerson has not provided the Court with proper proof of service for each document.
Accordingly, Wilkerson’s affidavit of indigence, Motion for Reporter’s Record, and Motion to be Assigned Counsel are stricken.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed June 2, 2016
Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Senrick Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office (Senrick Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.