Senrick Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 2, 2016·No. 10-16-00119-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00119-CV

SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant

v.

HUNTSVILLE INSTITUTIONAL PAROLE OFFICE, ET AL, Appellees

From the 12th District Court Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1527660

ORDER

Senrick Wilkerson’s affidavit of indigence, Motion for Reporter’s Record, and Motion to be Assigned Counsel, each filed on April 27, 2016 did not contain a proper proof of service as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. By letter dated April 29, 2016, the Clerk of this Court warned Wilkerson that the failure to provide a proper proof of service for each document within 14 days from the date of the letter would result in the Court striking the affidavit of indigence, Motion for Reporter’s

Record, and Motion to be Assigned Counsel. More than 14 days have passed and Wilkerson has not provided the Court with proper proof of service for each document.

Accordingly, Wilkerson’s affidavit of indigence, Motion for Reporter’s Record, and Motion to be Assigned Counsel are stricken.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed June 2, 2016

Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Senrick Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Senrick Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office (Senrick Wilkerson v. Huntsville Institutional Parole Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.