Senoski, Pet v. Wetzel
This text of Senoski, Pet v. Wetzel (Senoski, Pet v. Wetzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Senoski, Pet v. Wetzel, (Pa. 2020).
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
KENNETH A. SENOSKI, PRO SE, : No. 90 WM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : SECURITY PROCESSING CENTER, : SUPERINTENDENT, JOHN WETZEL, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2020, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Senoski, Pet v. Wetzel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senoski-pet-v-wetzel-pa-2020.