Senna v. Kennedy
371 U.S. 840, 83 S. Ct. 67, 9 L. Ed. 2d 75, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 718
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 8, 1962
DocketNo. 147, Misc.
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases
This text of 371 U.S. 840 (Senna v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Senna v. Kennedy, 371 U.S. 840, 83 S. Ct. 67, 9 L. Ed. 2d 75, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 718 (1962).
Opinion
Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anthony Spano v. N. v. Koninklijke Rotterdamsche Lloyd, and Third Party v. Universal Terminal & Stevedoring Corp., Third Party
472 F.2d 33 (Second Circuit, 1973)
Carmelo Candiano v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. John W. McGrath Corporation, Third-Party
386 F.2d 444 (Second Circuit, 1967)
Louis Antoine v. Lake Charles Stevedores, Inc., Lykes Brothers Steamship Company, Inc. And the Travelers Insurance Company
376 F.2d 443 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
Reed v. Bank Lines, Ltd.
285 F. Supp. 808 (E.D. Louisiana, 1966)
Nicholson v. Aurora Shipping Corp.
278 F. Supp. 272 (S.D. Texas, 1966)
Radovich v. Cunard Steamship Co.
364 F.2d 149 (Second Circuit, 1966)
Martin Radovich, Libelant-Appellant v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd., Respondent-Impleading v. John T. Clark & Son and Gourock Ropework Co., Ltd., Respondents-Impleaded
364 F.2d 149 (Second Circuit, 1966)
Josepn Skibinski v. Waterman Steamship Corporation v. International Terminaloperating Co., Inc., Third-Party
360 F.2d 539 (Second Circuit, 1966)
Candiano v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
251 F. Supp. 654 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Skibinski v. Waterman Steamship Corp.
242 F. Supp. 290 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Reid v. Quebec Paper Sales & Transportation Co.
340 F.2d 34 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Hubert Reid, Libelant-Appellee v. Quebec Paper Sales & Transportation Company, Limited and Donnacona Paper Company, Limited v. William Spencer & Son Corp., Respondent-Impleaded
340 F.2d 34 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Mistretta v. S. S. Ocean Evelyn
243 F. Supp. 86 (E.D. New York, 1964)
Ferrante v. Swedish American Lines
331 F.2d 571 (Third Circuit, 1964)
Alfonso Spinelli, Libellant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee v. Isthmian Steamship Company, a Corporation, Respondent-Petitioner-Appellee and Cross-Appellant v. International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee and Cross-Appellant
326 F.2d 870 (Second Circuit, 1964)
Spinelli v. Isthmian Steamship Co.
326 F.2d 870 (Second Circuit, 1964)
Vincent Forkin v. Furness Withy & Co., Ltd.
323 F.2d 638 (Second Circuit, 1963)
William Knox, in No. 13973 v. United States Lines Company, in No. 13974 v. T. Hogan Corporation
320 F.2d 247 (Third Circuit, 1963)
Joseph Walters v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.
312 F.2d 893 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
371 U.S. 840, 83 S. Ct. 67, 9 L. Ed. 2d 75, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senna-v-kennedy-scotus-1962.