Home/Supreme Court/Senk v. Pennsylvania

Senk v. Pennsylvania

378 U.S. 562, 84 S. Ct. 1928
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 22, 1964
Docket900, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 378 U.S. 562 (Senk v. Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Senk v. Pennsylvania, 378 U.S. 562, 84 S. Ct. 1928 (1964).

Opinion

378 U.S. 562 (1964)

SENK
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.

No. 900, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Senk
582 A.2d 1119 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Frank Earl Senk v. Charles H. Zimmerman, Superintendent and Leroy Zimmerman, Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
886 F.2d 611 (Third Circuit, 1989)
Commonwealth v. Senk
437 A.2d 1218 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Bartman
367 A.2d 1121 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Mervin
326 A.2d 602 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
United States of America, Ex Rel., Frank Earl Senk, S-0026 v. J. R. Brierley, Superintendent
471 F.2d 657 (Third Circuit, 1973)
State v. Ussery
452 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
United States of America Ex Rel. Edwin Gockley v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania
411 F.2d 216 (Third Circuit, 1969)
United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Earl Senk v. H. E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania
396 F.2d 445 (Third Circuit, 1968)
United States ex rel. Gockley v. Myers
276 F. Supp. 748 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 U.S. 562, 84 S. Ct. 1928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senk-v-pennsylvania-scotus-1964.