Senk v. Danbury National Bank

Connecticut Superior Court

Senk v. Danbury National Bank

13 Conn. Supp. 234, 1945 Conn. Super. LEXIS 26

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided February 27, 1945·No. File No. 64457·Published

Opinion

WYNNE, J.

The court is of the opinion that the reasons urged in 'support of the motion are more persuasive than the fact that the attorneys for the plaintiff are located in New Haven and the plaintiff himself has his headquarters in New York. This would seem to be a case which should be tried in Waterbury. No inconvenience appearing for plaintiff or his counsel, the motion for transfer is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WYNNE, J.

The court is of the opinion that the reasons urged in 'support of the motion are more persuasive than the fact that the attorneys for the plaintiff are located in New Haven and the plaintiff himself has his headquarters in New York. This would seem to be a case which should be tried in Waterbury. No inconvenience appearing for plaintiff or his counsel, the motion for transfer is granted.

Senk v. Danbury National Bank, 13 Conn. Supp. 234, 1945 Conn. Super. LEXIS 26 (Colo. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

13 Conn. Supp. 234 (Senk v. Danbury National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.