Senk v. Danbury National Bank

Connecticut Superior Court

Senk v. Danbury National Bank

13 Conn. Supp. 234, 1945 Conn. Super. LEXIS 26

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedFebruary 27, 1945

DocketFile No. 64457

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Conn. Supp. 234 (Senk v. Danbury National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Senk v. Danbury National Bank, 13 Conn. Supp. 234, 1945 Conn. Super. LEXIS 26 (Colo. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

WYNNE, J.

The court is of the opinion that the reasons urged in 'support of the motion are more persuasive than the fact that the attorneys for the plaintiff are located in New Haven and the plaintiff himself has his headquarters in New York. This would seem to be a case which should be tried in Waterbury. No inconvenience appearing for plaintiff or his counsel, the motion for transfer is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WYNNE, J.

The court is of the opinion that the reasons urged in 'support of the motion are more persuasive than the fact that the attorneys for the plaintiff are located in New Haven and the plaintiff himself has his headquarters in New York. This would seem to be a case which should be tried in Waterbury. No inconvenience appearing for plaintiff or his counsel, the motion for transfer is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Conn. Supp. 234, 1945 Conn. Super. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senk-v-danbury-national-bank-connsuperct-1945.