Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Senior v. State

Senior v. State

103 S.E. 730, 25 Ga. App. 541, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 61
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 28, 1920
Docket11595
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 730 (Senior v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Senior v. State, 103 S.E. 730, 25 Ga. App. 541, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 61 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

In no case where the motion for new trial contains the general grounds only, and there is a conflict in the evidence, is this court called upon to say which witness or witnesses spoke the truth. This is a question entirely for the jury, under a proper charge of the court. ■ In such a case all that is necessary for this court to determine is whether or not there is any evidence to support the verdict. In this case there is “some” evidence to support the verdict, for a witness testified: ■ “We found some whisky there about 35 steps from his house, right in the edge of the yard. It was just below his yard, on his premises. There [542]*542was a gallon jug, two quarts, and three or four coca-cola bottles full.” The trial judge was satisfied with the verdict, and we cannot interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. State
166 S.E.2d 41 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Rhodes v. State
92 S.E.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Henderson v. State
164 S.E. 70 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Tate v. State
116 S.E. 541 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 730, 25 Ga. App. 541, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senior-v-state-gactapp-1920.