Senior v. Fitzgerald

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Senior v. Fitzgerald

119 N.Y.S. 745

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 119 N.Y.S. 745 (Senior v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Senior v. Fitzgerald, 119 N.Y.S. 745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover $390 for commissions alleged to have been earned in causing the sale of certain real estate. The undisputed evidence shows that $40,000 was the lowest price the plaintiff was authorized to sell the property for, and that $38,000 was the -best offer he obtained. The property was subsequently sold by a third party for the sum of $39,000. It follows that the plaintiff did not produce a party who was willing, ready, and able to-purchase the property at the owner's terms.

[746]*746The evidence adduced by the plaintiff was "insufficient to take this case out of the general rule of law applicable to cases of this kind.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover $390 for commissions alleged to have been earned in causing the sale of certain real estate. The undisputed evidence shows that $40,000 was the lowest price the plaintiff was authorized to sell the property for, and that $38,000 was the -best offer he obtained. The property was subsequently sold by a third party for the sum of $39,000. It follows that the plaintiff did not produce a party who was willing, ready, and able to-purchase the property at the owner's terms.

[746]*746The evidence adduced by the plaintiff was "insufficient to take this case out of the general rule of law applicable to cases of this kind.

The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 N.Y.S. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senior-v-fitzgerald-nyappterm-1909.