Sengel v. Doremus
113 N.Y.S. 1146
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 27, 1908·Published
Opinion
Action by Emilia Sengel against Kathryne G. Doremus and others. No opinion. There has been nothing to prevent the plaintiff from having the premises readvertised, as directed in the order. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sengel v. Doremus, 113 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
113 N.Y.S. 1146 (Sengel v. Doremus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.