Sengel v. Doremus
113 N.Y.S. 1146
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 27, 1908
StatusPublished
This text of 113 N.Y.S. 1146 (Sengel v. Doremus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sengel v. Doremus, 113 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
Opinion
Action by Emilia Sengel against Kathryne G. Doremus and others. No opinion. There has been nothing to prevent the plaintiff from having the premises readvertised, as directed in the order. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
113 N.Y.S. 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sengel-v-doremus-nyappdiv-1908.