Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

894 A.2d 992, 277 Conn. 911, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 63

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 14, 2006·No. SC 17606·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 365 (AC 26105), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of the [912]*912plaintiffs operation of a motor vehicle as required by General Statutes § 14-227b?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17606. Priscilla J. Green, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Steven A. Torneo, in opposition. Decided February 14, 2006

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn. App. 365 (AC 26105), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of the [912]*912plaintiffs operation of a motor vehicle as required by General Statutes § 14-227b?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17606. Priscilla J. Green, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Steven A. Torneo, in opposition. Decided February 14, 2006

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 894 A.2d 992, 277 Conn. 911, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 63 (Colo. 2006).

Pincite

894 A.2d 992 (Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related