Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

894 A.2d 992, 277 Conn. 912
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 14, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 894 A.2d 992 (Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 894 A.2d 992, 277 Conn. 912 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

894 A.2d 992 (2006)
277 Conn. 912

Indy SENGCHANTHONG
v.
COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided February 14, 2006.

Priscilla J. Green, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition.

Steven A. Tomeo, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 92 Conn.App. 365, 885 A.2d 218 (2005), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of the plaintiff's operation of a motor vehicle as required by General Statutes § 14-227b?"

ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17606.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sengchanthong v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
917 A.2d 942 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 A.2d 992, 277 Conn. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sengchanthong-v-commissioner-of-motor-vehicles-conn-2006.