Senft v. Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.
This text of 95 So. 3d 398 (Senft v. Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the final summary judgment entered in this contract action, as the ap-pellee failed to conclusively negate the affirmative defenses raised by appellant. See Corya v. Sanders, 76 So.3d 31, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Riverwood Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Litecrete, Inc., 69 So.3d 983, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). Moreover, the appel-lee relied in its affidavit in support of summary judgment on a contract (order form) which was never mentioned or relied upon as part of the contract in its complaint. At the very least, it raises a material issue of fact as to what constituted the contract between the parties. See, e.g., Grumman Ecosystems Corp. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 391 So.2d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 So. 3d 398, 2012 WL 3101405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senft-v-patterson-dental-supply-inc-fladistctapp-2012.