Senft v. Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.

95 So. 3d 398, 2012 WL 3101405
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2012·No. No. 4D11-712·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment entered in this contract action, as the ap-pellee failed to conclusively negate the affirmative defenses raised by appellant. See Corya v. Sanders, 76 So.3d 31, 34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Riverwood Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Litecrete, Inc., 69 So.3d 983, 985 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). Moreover, the appel-lee relied in its affidavit in support of summary judgment on a contract (order form) which was never mentioned or relied upon as part of the contract in its complaint. At the very least, it raises a material issue of fact as to what constituted the contract between the parties. See, e.g., Grumman Ecosystems Corp. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 391 So.2d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

WARNER, POLEN and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Senft v. Patterson Dental Supply, Inc., 95 So. 3d 398, 2012 WL 3101405 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

95 So. 3d 398 (Senft v. Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riverwood Condominium Ass'n v. Litecrete, Inc.
69 So. 3d 983 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Corya v. Sanders
76 So. 3d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Grumman Ecosystems Corp. v. Palm Beach County
391 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)