Senez v. Carney
This text of 105 A.3d 514 (Senez v. Carney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER.
The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, it is this 22nd day of December, 2014
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, summarily vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for further consideration in light of Deborah Hiob, et al. v. Progressive American Insurance Company, et al., 440 Md. 466, 103 A.3d 596 (2014). Costs in this Court to be paid by the Respondent, and costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 A.3d 514, 441 Md. 104, 2014 Md. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senez-v-carney-md-2014.