Senese v. Senese
This text of 268 A.D. 928 (Senese v. Senese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by plaintiff from an order granting an allowance for services to be rendered by her counsel on an appeal prosecuted by defendant from a judgment of separation, on the ground that the allowance was inadequate. Order affirmed, without costs. In view of the amount of the allowance for [929]*929counsel fee on the trial, the allowance made herein was adequate. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 A.D. 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senese-v-senese-nyappdiv-1944.