Sener v. Corporation of the Borough of Ephrata

34 A. 954, 176 Pa. 80, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1045
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 28, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 382·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The learned judge of the court below reached a correct conclusion in this case. The act of 1895 is plainly expressed, is definite in its directions, and free from ambiguity. We cannot reform it to meet a supposed legislative intent not expressed and not apparent on its face. The conclusions of law drawn by the learned judge are an adequate discussion of the subject, and justify the decree appealed from. It is affirmed upon these conclusions. The costs to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sener v. Corporation of the Borough of Ephrata, 34 A. 954, 176 Pa. 80, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1045 (Pa. 1896).

34 A. 954 (Sener v. Corporation of the Borough of Ephrata) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southwestern National Bank v. Riegner
140 A. 615 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
State, Ex Rel. v. Bowman, Auditor
156 N.E. 394 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1927)
Smith v. Young
103 A. 63 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Schenck v. Burgess
37 A. 258 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)