Senechal v. Frazer

Montana Supreme Court

Senechal v. Frazer

139 P.2d 544, 113 Mont. 614, 1942 Mont. LEXIS 62

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 20, 1942

DocketNo. 8,318.

StatusPublished

This text of 139 P.2d 544 (Senechal v. Frazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Senechal v. Frazer, 139 P.2d 544, 113 Mont. 614, 1942 Mont. LEXIS 62 (Mo. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent having filed with the clerk of this court his motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause upon the grounds that the appeal was taken more than six months after the judgment appealed from, and that the time has long expired for the filing of an undertaking on appeal or the deposit of money in lieu thereof, such undertaking or deposit not having been waived, the motion being supported by affi *615 davits showing that it is well made, and the time for counter-affidavits and brief in opposition to the motion having expired without such affidavits or brief having been filed, it is ordered that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

Messrs. John M. Kline, C. H. Roberts and John Marriott Kline, for Respondent. Messrs. Busha & Greenan, for Appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Respondent having filed with the clerk of this court his motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause upon the grounds that the appeal was taken more than six months after the judgment appealed from, and that the time has long expired for the filing of an undertaking on appeal or the deposit of money in lieu thereof, such undertaking or deposit not having been waived, the motion being supported by affi *615 davits showing that it is well made, and the time for counter-affidavits and brief in opposition to the motion having expired without such affidavits or brief having been filed, it is ordered that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

Messrs. John M. Kline, C. H. Roberts and John Marriott Kline, for Respondent. Messrs. Busha & Greenan, for Appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 P.2d 544, 113 Mont. 614, 1942 Mont. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/senechal-v-frazer-mont-1942.