Seneca Insurance v. Hong Kong Hang Wo (U.S.A.) Inc.

268 A.D.2d 211, 700 N.Y.S.2d 680, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 24

This text of 268 A.D.2d 211 (Seneca Insurance v. Hong Kong Hang Wo (U.S.A.) Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seneca Insurance v. Hong Kong Hang Wo (U.S.A.) Inc., 268 A.D.2d 211, 700 N.Y.S.2d 680, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 24 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner-Gans, J.), entered October 7, 1998, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the total sum of $78,985.18, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant failed to controvert the trial evidence tending to establish plaintiffs standing as a duly licensed insurance company. Moreover, defendant failed to affirmatively plead the defenses it now raises in regard to plaintiffs status. Hence, these defenses were waived. Also waived was defendant’s claim of jurisdictional deficiency based upon plaintiffs failure to timely file an affidavit of service, since defendant appeared and defended the action without raising that jurisdictional objection (see, Matter of Fry v Village of Tarrytown, 89 NY2d 714).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fry v. Village of Tarrytown
680 N.E.2d 578 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 211, 700 N.Y.S.2d 680, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seneca-insurance-v-hong-kong-hang-wo-usa-inc-nyappdiv-2000.