Seneca Engel v. Derek Engel
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
No. 22-2549
Seneca Lovett Engel
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Derek Engel; Miller Police Department; City of Miller, South Dakota; Jim Henson, Miller Police Department, officially and individually; Shannon Speck, Miller Police Department, officially and individually; Various John and Jane Does, Miller Police Department, officially and individually
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Central
Submitted: March 23, 2023 Filed: April 11, 2023 [Unpublished]
Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
South Dakota resident Seneca Lovett Engel appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se complaint for failure to state a claim. After careful de novo review, see Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1 The Honorable Roberto Lange, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seneca Engel v. Derek Engel (Seneca Engel v. Derek Engel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.